Page 2 of 2

Re: New Columbia Deer Regs and The HFA

Posted: July 20th, 2004, 11:59 am
by hobiecat
PS, trespassin is not a legitimate argument for not hunting Twin Lakes. Twin Lakes is City owned property. If an individual hunter takes it upon themselves to trespass, that is that individuals mistake and they should suffer the appropriate consequences. However trespassing can occur anywhere, not just around City land, therefore if we are going to use trespassing as a justification to not hunt on this land... it can be used as an argument for hunting in general. Not a valid argument.

Re: New Columbia Deer Regs and The HFA

Posted: July 20th, 2004, 12:09 pm
by PoisonSnake
No shit? Did you see where I made the statement that most of the argument I was making did not apply to the city owned lands? Two different things altogether you dumbass. Like I have said though, either that particular property needs to be strictly regulated, or it should not be hunted. Simple as that. You have people walking all over that place on hiking trails, etc... In fact, the dog and I often hit it in Jan/Feb looking for sheds.

Re: New Columbia Deer Regs and The HFA

Posted: July 20th, 2004, 12:15 pm
by hobiecat
In fact, the dog and I often hit it in Jan/Feb looking for sheds.


How big were the sheds, and what color is your dog (just for future reference)?
Image Image

Re: New Columbia Deer Regs and The HFA

Posted: July 20th, 2004, 12:25 pm
by PoisonSnake
There is one real nice shed down there not terribly far from the entrance on Scott Blvd. Can't remember the color. The dog is black.

Re: New Columbia Deer Regs and The HFA

Posted: July 20th, 2004, 12:29 pm
by hobiecat
I will do my best not to arrow any black dogs near the entrance on Scott Blvd.

Re: New Columbia Deer Regs and The HFA

Posted: July 20th, 2004, 12:31 pm
by BornBad
All this shed talk reminds me I need to buy some more arrows... Sheds does a number on them, even the carbon ones. think I got 2 good ones left.