OutdoorMissouri.com

Well I had that happen the other day, so I hooked up the continuim transponder and the moon turned purple.

Who the fornicate cares, dumbass? He took the time to cut/paste and find/replace...just for that he should be thrown in the fire along with you two idgits. :shakinmyhead:

Well written MOCraig.

MOCraig said:
He didn't write that, you dummards. "Find and Replace" is a beautiful thing.

Actually, Scott Pakin's Automatic Complaint Letter Generator is a beautiful thing...

MoCraig - Okay, I'm typing this real slow so you'll understand. NOBODY fornicating CARES!

Well I don't care who wrote it, they did it well!

Geez big john you're dumber that dave t.

I'm totally confused.

Do you ever wake up in the morning thinking, "I will not stand by and let anyone twist my words or change my position in order to serve some dirty political strategy?" Well, so do I. But before I continue, allow me to explain that immoralism is not merely an attack on our moral fiber. It is also a politically motivated attack on knowledge. Perhaps I'm reading too much into Rainbow's arguments, but they don't seem to serve any purpose other than to advocate humorless zingers. He is too stolid to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that he has been deluding people into believing that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. Don't let him delude you, too.

I don't wish to psychologize here, but we can divide Rainbow's hijinks into three categories: sullen, tactless, and ridiculous. A desire to wear a cloak of status and prestige is the only explanation for Rainbow's otherwise inexplicable behavior. With this central point cleared up, the rest of his arguments are rendered moot, as Rainbow's "I'm right and you're wrong" attitude is jaded, because it leaves no room for compromise.

Even Rainbow's proxies are afraid that Rainbow will eliminate those law-enforcement officers who constitute the vital protective bulwark in the fragile balance between anarchy and tyranny in the blink of an eye. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again, and it is further evidence that we should agree on definitions before saying anything further about Rainbow's scurrilous prevarications. For starters, let's say that "collectivism" is "that which makes Rainbow yearn to attack the critical realism and impassive objectivity that are the central epistemological foundations of the scientific worldview." He periodically puts up a facade of reform. However, underneath the pretty surface, it's always business as usual. I could tell Rainbow that his prank phone calls are grounded in phony acts of kindness, although he obviously doesn't care. I could tell him that the world today seems to be going crazy, but he wouldn't believe me. He probably also doesn't care that poison is countered only by an antidote. So let me appeal to whatever small semblance of reason Rainbow may be capable of when I tell him that perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of the worst types of cynical election-year also-rans I've ever seen. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that now that I've been exposed to Rainbow's wheelings and dealings, I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps my general thesis is that Rainbow doesn't care about freedom, as he can neither eat it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to him. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish my general thesis: By allowing him to panic irrationally and overreact completely, we are allowing him to play puppet master. While reading this letter, you may have occasionally asked yourself, "Where is all of this leading?" and, "What is the point exactly?" I deliberately wrote in the style I did so that you may come up with your own conclusions. Therefore, I leave you with only the following: Rainbow's cock-and-bull stories are all too often clad in the noisome garb of sensationalism.

OF - I thought you had MOCraig on your "ignore list"? If you do, how do you know what he typed?

rainbow said:
Geez big john you're dumber that dave t.

Thanks for the vote of confidence there rainbow, I really appreciate it. Finally, someone dumber than me, wow, what a relief.

See dave, I told you earlier there was hope for you.

I am writing this letter because I take issue with some of Rabbi Rainbow Snowflake's publicity stunts. Before I begin, let me point out that if I recall correctly, someone once said to me, "Rabbi Snowflake should shift for herself." This phrase struck me so forcefully that I have often used it since. She possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, she can't even spell or define "erudition", much less achieve it. Rabbi Snowflake has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to trick us into trading freedom for serfdom. On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that she wouldn't know a new idea if it hit her over the head. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time she tried to create division in the name of diversity. Let's face it: The real question here is not, "Is she hoping that the readers of this letter won't see the weakness of her argument relative to mine?". The real question is rather, "Why is it that 99 times out of 100, she is the grand master of obfuscation and misdirection?" There aren't enough hours in the day to fully answer that question, but consider this: Rabbi Snowflake ignores a breathtaking number of facts, most notably:

Fact: It is incumbent upon all of us to confront Rabbi Snowflake's viewpoints head-on.

Fact: Rabbi Snowflake has a hidden agenda.

Fact: Scores of people, just like you, have finally decided that they've had enough of Rabbi Snowflake's slurs.

In addition, the concepts underlying Rabbi Snowflake's stentorian notions are like the Ptolemaic astronomy, which could not have been saved by positing more epicycles or eliminating some of the more glaring discrepancies. The fundamental idea -- that the heavens revolve around the Earth -- was wrong, just as Rabbi Snowflake's idea that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all entirely justified is wrong. Imagine a world in which Rabbi Snowflake could discredit legitimate voices in the Pyrrhonism debate whenever she felt like it. She has certainly never given evidence of thinking extensively. Or at all, for that matter.

I'm not the first to mention that her anecdotes have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together -- life! As I understand it, if Rabbi Snowflake honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from her. Many experts now believe that she should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory. Although it's easy to sit in the press box and criticize, Rabbi Snowflake exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up her obvious inferiority.

Are you beginning to get the picture here? Throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to make an impartial and well-informed evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of her jokes and those who wish to lower this country's moral tone and depreciate its commercial integrity. Naturally, Rabbi Snowflake belongs to the latter category. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, have had enough of her airy-fairy talk of "maybe this or maybe that". Which brings me to my next criticism of Rabbi Snowflake. Perhaps it sounds like stating the obvious to say that we must indisputably create greater public understanding of the damage caused by her beliefs. Does that sound extremist? Is it too ethically bankrupt for you? I'm sorry if it seems that way, but that's life.

Her arguments are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're utterly pertinacious, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, we must pronounce the truth and renounce the lies. Our children depend on that. Rabbi Snowflake deserves to be punished. The destruction of the Tower of Babel, be it a literal truth, an allegory, or a mere story based upon cultural archetypes, illustrates this truth plainly. She doesn't shower often enough. It's that simple.

In her slogans, extremism is witting and unremitting, rotten and perverted. She revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to control, manipulate, and harm other people. Rabbi Snowflake's scribblings cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that my bitterness at Rabbi Snowflake is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish. Her personal attacks are perpetuated by an ethos of continuous reform, the demand that one strive permanently and painfully for something which not only does not exist, but is alien to the human condition. I want to unify our community. Rabbi Snowflake, in contrast, wants to drive divisive ideological wedges through it. Help me exemplify the principles of honor, duty, loyalty, and courage. Join your hands with mine in this, the greatest cause of our time.

MOCraig said:
I nominate Dave for the next MOW.

That's bullchit!!!