You'd be hard pressed to get him for shooting at a deer after dark and/or out of season, because he was shooting at a chunk of plastic
If that's the case, then how does MDC get away with charging people for this when shooting a remote controlled deer?
I'm all for MDC operating robo-deer!! We used to have some property outside Mack's Creek (Oneshot's neck of the woods). One year we went into town to check deer over lunch of opening day. Stopped at the cafe for lunch and the locals kept riding this dude. He was a city dude that owned land down there and came down once a year to shoot deer. Always pretty rude to locals. Seems as though he was on his way to his land opening morning, when he spotted a nice buck standing out in a field. So he did what any self-respecting city slicker
would do....he stopped the truck and whacked it. Unfortunately, "it" was a robo deer. Before opening of the season, this dude lost his gun and had a big ole ticket. He was not happy...and the locals were just rubbin' salt.
Why in the hell MDC didn't take his truck is beyond me!!
Politicians are like shoemakers who make pretty shoeboxes but forget to make the shoes.
on it, and a rifle comes out and POW. Well I turned the outside light on and stood on the deck with my gun and they took off. Called the GW and he didn,t seem too upset.My question is, how many would be in favor of the GW using the remote-controlled deer for catching poachers?? 
(and they do)- but in the end, the tax payer is paying for the prosecution, proly the public defender and for their stay at the county/state bed and breakfast. 
