I say let by-gones be by-gones

TOS · Post by **TOS** » March 5th, 2004, 4:14 pm

For all you dumbasses that I have put in your place at one time or another, I say we wipe the slate clean. From here on out, I am here for friendly down-home advice and nothing more. I hope you boys can tolerate the more user-friendly MS.

TOS · Post by **TOS** » March 5th, 2004, 4:21 pm

Oh yeah, I hereby proclaim myself as Moderator of the Deer Forum. This is not a dictatorship. This is a democracy. I am here to serve you. I just wanted you boys to know that I am here for you. Some of you will definitely be needing me and the other CCGC members come October.

coyote.whacker · Post by **coyote.whacker** » March 5th, 2004, 4:28 pm

I would agree with your appointment if I knew who the fukc you are and whose monkey you been spankin.

TTTim · Post by **TTTim** » March 5th, 2004, 4:33 pm

Look Spanky,
I dont recognize you as a toilet paper collector at a Diarrhea Festival. I got your gentler/kinder Spanker right here. The CCGC couldnt pick a better spokesperson.
TTim

2BHNTN · Post by **2BHNTN** » March 5th, 2004, 4:54 pm

I agree MS but could you change your name back to something we all could recognize as who you might be. After that, you got my vote on moderator.

Regards,

( 2B ) Dennis

DoniphanRedneck · Post by **DoniphanRedneck** » March 5th, 2004, 4:57 pm

The slate is clean if you ask me...

I'll vote for you ask moderater too .... But I would still love to be able to miss with griffins posts for the fun of it when he does post.

DoniphanRedneck

coyote.whacker · Post by **coyote.whacker** » March 5th, 2004, 4:58 pm

2B, we all recognize the rivalry between the WAS and the CCGC. This is healthy. However, we need to take a time out from the funnin to remember why we are on this board and like all refugees stick together and not post on the cc and keep this board healthy and listed to our founder Jim Dog when he speaks. You OK with that?

2BHNTN · Post by **2BHNTN** » March 5th, 2004, 5:03 pm

Dayuum.... I said yes the last time you said this.

TOS · Post by **TOS** » March 5th, 2004, 5:05 pm

There will be no mention of WAS in my house.

TTTim · Post by **TTTim** » March 5th, 2004, 5:07 pm

WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS WAS
Tell me when to stop.....
TTTim

DoniphanRedneck · Post by **DoniphanRedneck** » March 5th, 2004, 5:08 pm

stop! That good enough? Or are you to stupid to know when to stop?

DoniphanRedneck

coyote.whacker · Post by **coyote.whacker** » March 5th, 2004, 5:10 pm

2B I is cornfused

look at the Class Act thread.

2BHNTN · Post by **2BHNTN** » March 5th, 2004, 5:12 pm

Yes HC you are confused. I see that on the Class thread.

fish · Post by **fish** » March 5th, 2004, 5:16 pm

......and so it begins. The Yanks vs the Rebs, Axis vs Allies, et al. Two polarized groups squaring off, measuring each other before gettin ready to rumble.

(Let by-gones be by-gones didn't last very long.)

coyote.whacker · Post by **coyote.whacker** » March 5th, 2004, 5:17 pm

OK 2B, if on no other issue, the WAS and the CCGC will stand together on OutdoorMissouri.com issues. AGREED?

OutdoorMissouri.com

I say let by-gones be by-gones

I say let by-gones be by-gones

Re: I say let by-gones be by-gones

Re: I say let by-gones be by-gones

Re: I say let by-gones be by-gones

Re: I say let by-gones be by-gones

Re: I say let by-gones be by-gones

Re: I say let by-gones be by-gones

Re: I say let by-gones be by-gones

Re: I say let by-gones be by-gones

Re: I say let by-gones be by-gones

Re: I say let by-gones be by-gones

Re: I say let by-gones be by-gones

Re: I say let by-gones be by-gones

Re: I say let by-gones be by-gones

Re: I say let by-gones be by-gones